Episodes Blog About Shop
Subscribe

Normal Person Vs... Jamie Oliver



Comments

Ben Sanders | 2008-10-15 12:14:03 UTC

Very entertaining, and sufficently funny in places that I had to be quite carefull of not spitting out my drink in the wrong way.

I was somewhat surprised to see you discribe Steve as a ‘normal person’ although it might be a more reasonable statement in the context of cooking.

Hugh | 2008-10-15 12:54:57 UTC

He’s normal-ish…

Actually, we were pretty surprised at his cooking expertise. Turns out he’s a bit of a dark horse cooking-wise.

Stuart Carter | 2008-10-15 13:42:33 UTC

Was that a Scotmid I saw you guys going into? :)

And thanks for confirming my prejudices when it comes to the sleb-chefs!

Justin | 2008-10-15 14:08:38 UTC

Have to agree with Ben, Steve? a normal people?

Hugh, where do you get your semola flour? I’m running out.

Oh, and could I be so bold(or maybe rude) to suggest the steady shot on the camera, started feeling a bit queesy!

Hugh | 2008-10-15 15:20:26 UTC

@Justin – We got our semolina flour from Valvona and Corolla, which may indeed be one of the few places in Edinburgh to get it. Waitrose might have it too.

Steadycam – yeah, I think we’ll be investing for Series 1…

@Stuart – Yep, that was indeed a Scotmid!

Sandra Stewart | 2008-10-15 16:53:59 UTC

Hey guys. This episode I was disappointed – maybe cause there were no cows?

Where does one buy Semolina flour anyway?

I must say Paul really doesn’t like that Jamie guy.

I feel the same way about Martha (who really isn’t one, just married into the name then her husband got a clue and divorced her) Stewart.

I can’t wait til next Wednesday.

Also- when are you guys going to show us one of your OWN recipes? I have some of my own I can share if you want to email me!

pajh | 2008-10-15 17:13:43 UTC

@Sandra: as I understand it, Jamie’s an appropriate UK equivalent to Martha. He’s about at patronizing, at least.

As for cows—-there’s beef mince in the ragu.

Thatone | 2008-10-15 20:32:56 UTC

Contributing to somethingawful immediately disqualifies you from counting as normal, as proved by the uncanny dough skills. I post there too :)

A little over the top at times and groanworthy with the cut-scenes that border on amusing and scientific but never really cross either line, but not bad at all. I’d watch more.

matthijs | 2008-10-15 22:58:11 UTC

As much as I loved your last show, this time you’re picking on the wrong guy. Heston, yes, however respectable he is, you can scold for requiring insane things of his followers. Jamie, on the other hand, is not doing anything particularly difficult. If “I don’t have a properly sized pasta pan to cook this” is the worst you can do, don’t bother. Really. They’re cheap.

It is, after all, proper science that cooking starchy substances should happen in very, very large pans (which are relatively, relatively cheap to buy).

Score for now: +1 -1.

Ben Sanders | 2008-10-16 07:58:56 UTC

The thought occures that, having compared Jamie’s dish to a spaghetti bolognese, maybe you should discrible how to cook the quick or easy version too (and why it works?).

Hugh | 2008-10-16 10:26:23 UTC

@matthijs – I agree, the pasta pans thing is annoying, but it’s not a dealbreaker. The real problem with Jamie’s recipe was this – it wasn’t very good. (I was there producing, and also ate some of it.) It took a very long time, was a lot of effort, and produced something rather inferior to what I’d normally cook in half the time. The ragu sauce was adequate, although I agree with numerous commenters (both here and on LiveJournal) that it could have been better, but the pasta just didn’t really work. Hence, not terribly impressed.

The recipe was fairly clear, although I suspect we could have done with more information on making pasta. But the food produced wasn’t great.

@Ben – great minds think alike. Look for a piece tomorrow.

Zelmor | 2008-10-16 14:08:36 UTC

Nice one. As a person cooking once in a while, i found celebrity-cooks rather annoying and no-good. One question, where can I get such a nice cloak? :]

Jason | 2008-10-16 14:10:23 UTC

Hey guys,

Your videos are pretty funny and the cooking info is good as well. One thing I noticed is that your walking shots bounce around a ton. Being geeks, you may have heard of Make magazine. In one of the first editions, they published instructions for making a $14 steady cam. The parts list is here:
http://makezine.com/01/stabilizer/

You can find a picture here:
http://procrastineering.blogspot.com/2007/12/14-steadycam.html

Directions for assembly are here:
http://www.microfilmmaker.com/tipstrick/Issue1/steadycam.html

Keep up the good work!

Kat | 2008-10-16 14:45:14 UTC

Hilarious.

Looking forward to watching more.

wolf whistles to the presenter & chef

Hugh | 2008-10-16 14:51:19 UTC

Thanks, guys! Glad you enjoyed it!

Steadicams – we’ll look into it for Series 1 :) I’ve been aware of the micro-steadicams for a while – time for some testing, methinks.

I’ll leave the comments on cloaks and general attractiveness to Paul :)

pajh | 2008-10-16 17:17:09 UTC

@matthijs: “Jamie, on the other hand, is not doing anything particularly difficult”

Well, yes. Except for the fact that a skilled cook (me) and a normal person had trouble following the recipe. And it contained ingredients that were nigh-on impossible to get, and implements not usually found in a normal kitchen (the pans depicted in the episode were the largest ones available in the normal kitchen used for filming). And it took three and a half hours to make food that was, at best, average. And that’s without getting into the irritating mannerisms or the questionable politics of the celebrity in question.

But if you ignore all of those things, then yes, the worst we can do is complain about pasta pans, and you’re absolutely right.

We set out to see if a celebrity-chef cookbook could provide a normal person in a normal kitchen with the information they needed to make celebrity-chef food. Jamie’s book failed rather miserably. I call that a conclusion, and the conclusion is “meh”.

pajh | 2008-10-16 17:25:15 UTC

We got our semolina flour (by which I mean Hugh’s semolina flour) from Valvona & Crolla, the incredibly upmarket Italian deli in Edinburgh. I’m advised that you can also get it in Real Foods, which means it’s probably available in any reasonably-sized health food shop.

Hakuo0000 | 2008-10-17 02:44:58 UTC

I’m going to have to agree with the gang on the pot thing, it really SHOULD have mentioned a huge pot and how much water to boil it in; too little water and you fail, but there really isn’t ‘too’ much. Anyway, back to pots… I doubt any normal person who hasn’t really cooked their own pasta or that much would know to have a big pot. NOT common knowledge.

I do hate when recipes call for rather rare ingrediants and just expect you or your local store to have them. It could of at least mentioned that the flour would be hard to find before you go search thirty stores and (not in your case) end up searching google. At least AB tells you that you’ll most likely won’t find it or a rather nice substitute.

When the shat did we start needing skewers to make pasta now, anyway? D:

Question: Did the book say to leave the noodles THAT big? They were fucking huuuuuuuge. If not, bad book. If so, wts? XD;

Would of been so much easier to cook noodles in the bag and get some prego. ="D

Nice funny episode, and everything seemed spot on to me. Whoooo.

Hugh | 2008-10-17 13:22:01 UTC

@Hakuo – Exactly. I like how Heston Blumenthal tends to point out all the unusual equipment you’ll need at the start of his recipes, right down to immersion blenders or big pots. Jamie just assumes you have them. Likewise with the semolina flour.

(Nigella… well, you’ll see in a couple of weeks.)

Steve and Paul followed the recipe pretty much to the letter. It says to make noodles “as thick as cigarettes”, and they were darn close. And also, really darned doughey.

Ze French | 2008-10-17 19:31:18 UTC

Hey guys,

I love your program! Keep up with ze good work, hehe.

The book you chose amongst – let’ face it – a million of Jay-ME’s extensive collection was probably not the easiest to start with.

The pots… Yeah it may be a problem… But 3.5 hours! That’s more than what a fifth of your day gone… pfff… It could have taken even longer if you would have followed the recipe, i.e. pasta first, sauce… well three hours later… That should be highlighted somewhere!

Debz | 2008-10-17 20:38:55 UTC

That was awesome! I loved it to bits and nearly snorted my drink out my nose during the onion ‘pealing’. Heh.

Katie | 2008-10-17 21:54:44 UTC

Another great episode. The only bit of criticism I have is that the sound goes from loud to waaaay too quiet between narrating and dialogue.

Also confirms my thoughts on celeb chefs: their recipes take for-fucking-ever and really aren’t worth all the hassle.

Chris Cooke | 2008-10-18 09:43:32 UTC

Terrific, loved it.

Main comment: amazed that Jamie Oliver recommends finely ground mince. Why? It’s so much nicer with coarsely chopped stuff. Get some texture in there. And maybe with a bit of chopped ham thrown in too.

The other main way to improve the sauce is just to cook it for several hours, which you did. But why? You’re geeks, you’re cooking with science, so it’d be great if you could tell us why, for instance, curries and stews in general always seem to taste better when either cooked for hours or when eaten the day after they’re made.

Oh, and by the way. Have you noticed how the sleb (thanks, love the spelling) chefs plug each others’ books? Couple of years ago in a big bookshop I saw Jamie’s and Nigel’s latest colourful tomes on display side by side. I picked them up and examined the back covers. Nigel’s book came with a cheery thumbs up from Jamie; Jamie’s had a glowing recommendation by Nigel. Blatant or what?

Hugh | 2008-10-18 11:22:22 UTC

@Katie – yeah, there were a couple of flubs on sound in that episode. Sorry – my Master Sound Guy was busy, so I ended up having to balance it myself, and a sound expert I am not. Hopefully next week’s will be smoother.

@Chris – One of the major reasons for a long, slow braise is to break down the collagen in the meat into gelatin, which will then flavour the sauce and give the entire thing a rich, unctuous feel. I think there are other reasons too – if I get time, I’ll check McGee.

And yeah, the “you slap my back” thing gets a bit annoying.

gabo | 2008-10-18 14:07:18 UTC

Fine straw man you have there chaps! It’s an interesting result considering the role-models you have in Blumenthal and McGee.

Hugh | 2008-10-18 14:29:45 UTC

@Gabo – interesting comment, but I’m not sure I understand you. Can you rephrase?

gabo | 2008-10-18 15:16:41 UTC

I was drawn into watching this clip based on your introductory phrase ‘Cooking the way real men cook: using Science’. In other situations, this clip -which was just an add hominem attack- might have brought a smile to my face. However, I was disheartened by the manner in which the clip was dressed up as a quasi experimental ‘trial’. It seems completely inappropriate to the scientific environment you are trying to promote. People like Blumenthal, McGee and This have urged the public to critically evaluate what they know about the culinary world. The fact that you are mixing these ideals with common slander is particularly disappointing.

Hugh | 2008-10-18 16:16:01 UTC

I’m sorry you were offended by the piece. I fear you may not be the target audience. :)

Nonetheless, I’m still not entirely sure what you mean by “straw man” or “common slander”. As part of an effort to see whether Jamie Oliver’s recipes are useful to a normal cook, we took an interesting-looking recipe and gave it a fair trial. Nothing you saw was faked. Steve and Paul tried their hardest to make the recipe as instructed, and the results were what you saw.

The sample size was a bit small, maybe, but in an effort to, as you put it, “critically evaluate what [we] know about the culinary world” we gave what appeared to be a showcase Jamie Oliver recipe a fair trial, and it came up wanting.

Erik | 2008-10-19 21:20:27 UTC

gabo & Hugh: this is balancing on a rather sharp edge, and it’s not always easy to stay on top. I partly agree with gabo, but also must give credit to Paul for the fair try and honest conclusion. Be too serious, and you lose people’s interest (at least those that you seem to aim at reaching). However, too much slander-ish talk, and one loses credibility. In my opinion, the fair attempt at Jamie’s recipe was in fact somewhat encouraging (taken your previous comments about the same J.) If you stay in there and are able to keep the fine balance, this might end up gaining cult status in a few years (…maybe)

Wheaty | 2008-10-21 03:54:42 UTC

I rather like your videos yet I fail to see the necessity for mspaint graphics when you explain cookery concepts, it’s poorly executed and smacks of low quality…you might want to try holding the camera steady too. Hopefully this advice will make better your videos???

Also, Mr olivier does makes rather large portions so if you had halfed the recipe you might get halfed the results and slandering oliver is getting rather tiresome he seems like a nice man. Oh try buying better ingredients too since spending a pittance at tesco will make your food slightly better than food stuffs from packets and jars. I know this from experience. You’re too geek and not cook enough, you need to find a fine balance.

Feel free to quote me. :)

Hugh | 2008-10-21 16:41:36 UTC

@Wheaty – In fact, we went to the Co-Op for two reasons, as far as buying food goes.

Firstly, this is meant to be a normal person’s test. Certainly, you can make some lovely stuff by spending £100 at Borough Market, but most normal people buy their food at supermarkets.

Secondly, in Scotland, Co-Op food has a reputation as being pretty high quality.

BTW, can you point out where we slander Jamie? We insult him a few times, but that’s not the same thing…

Thanks for the suggestions – we’ll bear them in mind.


Make a comment





Edit | Back

Normal Person Vs... Jamie Oliver

We’re on a mission – to see whether celebrity chef recipes are any use to normal people. This week – Paul, Jamie Oliver, and a lot of pasta dough…

Length: 12 min

Links:

Credits:

Presented by: Paul

Assisted by: Steve Wallace

Also featuring: Hugh and Alex

Camerawork and direction: Stuart Brown and Hugh Hancock

Script: Paul and Hugh

Motion Graphics: Hugh

Images by:

Bitterjug
Paoletta S.
WordRidden
she’s a renegade
jslander
cliff1066

License: Released under Creative Commons BY-SA-NC