Episodes Blog About Shop
Subscribe

The Perfect Steak



Comments

zornhau | 2008-10-08 14:52:36 UTC

Fantastic! But what did it taste like?

Hugh | 2008-10-08 15:02:34 UTC

Absolutely bloody gorgeous, actually. The few extra degrees hadn’t made as much differences as we’d feared. The inside was really lovely and moist, and the outside was crispy and generally fantastic.

Verdandi | 2008-10-08 15:03:12 UTC

Love it – and I’m a vegetarian.

Andrew Ducker | 2008-10-08 15:38:50 UTC

Very cool – but your license should be a link to the webpage on the CC site, and you should provide a download link for the video if it’s available CC…

Plus, more text on the page would be good – a clearer/longer explanation of the three parts of the meat, and what you’re doing at the different temperatures would be nice!

Damn good start though.

Hugh | 2008-10-08 16:43:58 UTC

Thanks – good points. I believe that you should be able to download the video via the Blip player?

I’ll add the CC link later.

As to more info – check the site tomorrow, when I will indeed have a small pile of additional information for both your delight and your delectation.

james gordon | 2008-10-08 17:48:57 UTC

Brilliant!
I want to see you on TV!
james

Julian | 2008-10-08 18:00:49 UTC

ROFL, awesome video guys, my favourite bit was the cow licking it’s chops! Brilliant editing. You guys should be on TV.

PS – Alex, did you remember to turn off the cooker? ;)

Zwee | 2008-10-08 18:51:15 UTC

Bloody brilliant!
This is the cooking show I’ve always wanted to do but never had the huevos to do myself. Thank you gentlemen for a great bit of pain-free, tasty science.

Oh, though I should add: one of you needs to speak just a WEE bit more slowly. I shan’t mention any names. :-) I just don’t want to miss any of the fun.

Dave Wright | 2008-10-08 18:58:17 UTC

Great stuff fellas, passed on by Jules, keep it up!

Phil Hunt | 2008-10-08 19:22:02 UTC

If fillet is an unused muscle, what’s it there for?

pajh | 2008-10-08 19:51:30 UTC

Presumably, it’s for filling up space inside the cow.

SpudTater | 2008-10-08 20:33:26 UTC

Perhaps not very accurate to say an ‘unused’ muscle… wikipedia describes it as “”http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filet_mignon">non-weight bearing", which makes more sense.

It seems to be used mainly to draw the legs forward, if its function is anything like that of the corresponding human muscle.

likeneontubing | 2008-10-08 21:29:39 UTC

loved it – only minor complaint is the graphics are sometimes too much, slightly less of them make more of an impact i feel – i’ll definitely be passing this around though – great work.

niggle | 2008-10-08 22:51:37 UTC

the times the same for every comment :)

pajh | 2008-10-08 23:02:16 UTC

Hey, /you/ try being technically accurate when you’re being filmed standing in a field with three animals bigger than you are, each of whom seems to get particularly irritable when you’re pointing out which bits on them are the tastiest.

I got the steak though, and that’s the main thing.

Hugh | 2008-10-08 23:40:15 UTC

Times on comments – yeah, I’ve noticed that too. Fixing it tomorrow, hopefully.

Lisa | 2008-10-09 00:08:52 UTC

Loved the Nigella spoof at the start, and the bit with the cow.

I wanted to see more of the steak at the end is my only criticism.

Julian | 2008-10-09 09:29:54 UTC

Just watched it for the 10th time ;) This time on youtube, now as a regular tuber I think you guys need to give your channel a bit of work! Also for episode one you need kamikaze cookery as a split keyword as it currently doesn’t show up on a search! Also, get a description metatag on your website! For the video pages generate a dynamic one based on the video titles, hurrah. SEO rant over, roll on next Wednesday!!

Hugh | 2008-10-09 11:09:17 UTC

I thought meta tags were basically deprecated these days? I’ll look into it.

What would you suggest we do for the YouTube channel?

Julian | 2008-10-09 15:12:20 UTC

Hey Hugh, Your description metatag is what shows up under your website title in search engine results. Defo not depreciated, if you need any help with that give me a shout, SEO keeps me in clothes ;) For the tube channel, make yourself a nice 1440px × 1850px background image that fits around your channel :) That should give you room for your new videos as they come. Setup your colours and add lots of nice info on the series. Then maybe get a playlist setup early for series 0 and add the first vid. Look about, there are some nice examples. Remember as soon as you post a youtube video they get duplicated all over the web on multiple video sites so fill it with keywords and links back to your site and get all the info 100% right before you publish it. Happy days.

Padmini | 2008-10-09 15:50:52 UTC

Nice one! Only crit: Hugh, you wave your hands about a wee bit too much :).

Hugh | 2008-10-09 16:20:07 UTC

@Julian – thanks.

@Padmini – ah, yeah, the old “ninja hands” as a friend of mine described them. Have done that for years – I’ll try and keep it in check…

PieSusan | 2008-10-09 16:58:16 UTC

Fucking brillant!!!!

CAIN | 2008-10-09 20:19:04 UTC

Fantastic! Funnier than hell, and I’m thinking of trying it as soon as I can afford steak. And a plumber’s torch. And a vacuum…

Still, absolutely brilliant work! I’ll be back for seconds.

Ben Sanders | 2008-10-09 22:59:30 UTC

Nice one folks, very entertaining.

Hugh | 2008-10-10 10:06:48 UTC

Thanks, guys!

Erik | 2008-10-10 14:16:06 UTC

Great approach. No doubt I’ll show this to my students. A couple of comments, though:

1) Is the vacuum cleaner really necessary? I usually use what we Norwegians would call Swedish vacuum (and the Swedes probably call Norwegian vacuum): put the bag to your mouth and use your lungs to suck in the air.

2) I find adjusting the water temperature to be easier starting with half-filled pots of cold and boiling water. Keep the cold pot on the range, minimum heat, add hot water until you reach the desired temperature (need to add some more after immersing the meat since it’ll cool down the water a bit). Adjust once in a while with cold or hot water. Also, using a very/stupendously large pot of water compared to the size of the meat is a good thing, as the need for temperature adjustment is minimized (it’d take much longer to reach your 64 degrees when you forget to look at the thermometer ;) Taking this to the extreme, the perfect pot would of course be a lake holding 55 degrees (is there one on Iceland, maybe?).

Hugh | 2008-10-10 14:19:26 UTC

@Erik – Thanks! Hope your students enjoy it.

The vacuum cleaner isn’t necessary, I must admit. We used it for two reasons – 1) it utterly prevents you getting meat juices in your mouth, with hilarious E. Coli-based results, and 2) it’s very funny to watch. But yeah, if you’re careful it’s often easier to just suck. So to speak.

Water temperature – yeah, I agree on all points there. If you don’t mind, I’ll suggest the half cold/half boiling approach in our mini-episode on Monday.

Of course, ideally you’d use a temperature-controlled water bath – they’re cheaper to create than you’d think. Again, I’ll cover that on Monday.

Rachel Green | 2008-10-11 07:43:05 UTC

Fabulous!
It made perfect sense.

Hugh | 2008-10-11 17:25:52 UTC

Thanks! It does, doesn’t it?

Fernando | 2008-10-13 19:31:12 UTC

Hugh,
Stupendly brilliant!
I’ll look for some legal/metalegal think to say about it (a defence of parody for Jaimie Oliver’s quasi-libel :-D and I’ll put it on the blog.

Alex F. | 2008-10-13 23:24:28 UTC

I just stumbled upon this website and I have to say that I am ridiculously impressed. The concept of a practical-application molecular gastronomy show is a brilliant one. My only qualm is that I feel a bit more attention should be paid to explaining why these cooking methods are superior to traditional ones, in order to help sway reluctant viewers.

Hugh | 2008-10-14 10:21:23 UTC

@Fernando – thanks! I’ll be interested to hear what you have to say…

@Alex – Good idea! I’ll consider doing a blog post or a mini-episode, although we do actually cover some of that later on in our digital thermometers episode.

Alex | 2008-10-14 10:27:50 UTC

Fantastic stuff, keep it coming.

Dave Lloyd | 2008-10-15 12:15:02 UTC

Awesome! Love the presentation and that steak did look good but where was the Galloping Gourmet shot of you all eating it in total ecstasy?

Looking forward to the next one!

Hugh | 2008-10-15 12:30:56 UTC

We weren’t sure whether to do the “oh, it’s gorgeous” shot – we actually filmed it, but it looked a bit rubbish, and we were worried about looking too much like a “normal” cooking show.

However, after the feedback, we’ll definitely make sure to do it next time.

Glad you liked it!

Justin | 2008-10-15 13:42:14 UTC

I love my steak and just personally disagree with some of your choices – not the cooking, I will have to try that to decide – but the cut (I think the ribeye is far better) and not to mention that beef is primarily from bullocks*, not cows. While we do eat cows, they are predominantly for milk and breeding (my family farms beef). Bullocks* are our main source of beef.

Also, you never mentioned the age of the beef and that it should be hung for at least 21 days. I mean, if nothing else you lost a potentially high comedy discussion on how well hung your meat should be!

*Bullocks for anyone wondering are neutered bulls or, bulls with no bollocks.

India Drummond | 2008-10-15 13:52:49 UTC

I don’t think you need to worry about this looking too much like a “normal” anything.

Very entertaining!

ILL Clinton | 2008-10-15 14:08:16 UTC

That was really fun. Very inventive. Looking forward to more.

Hugh | 2008-10-15 15:23:28 UTC

Thanks, guys! Glad you liked it!

@Justin – I’ll have to try sous-vide ribeye. I must confess, I absolutely love my fillet steak – it’s expensive but so worth it.

Is ribeye not a bit fattier? That’ll work less well at lower temperatures.

Update – Paul tells me that no, you can cut the fat out. Interesting.

Age – you’re absolutely right, we missed a trick there. D’oh.

I actually didn’t know that the meat’s mostly from bulls without bollocks – I’m sure Harold McGee mentions it somewhere, but I didn’t see it. Really handy info – thanks!

pajh | 2008-10-15 15:24:48 UTC

@Justin: yes, the cut is an issue. We just like fillet at Kamikaze Towers, but it’s all down to personal preference. I covered this (briefly) on the blog.

Around here at least, supermarkets are generally selling 21-day aged beef by default now—-but I still think it’s better to go to your local butcher if you can.

pajh | 2008-10-15 15:31:14 UTC

@Hugh: the fat in ribeye is mostly in one big lump in the middle. Some people don’t like that and get sirloin instead as a result, which is drier. These people are far too precious. You can just cut the fat and leave it on the side of the plate if you don’t like it; nobody’s going to stop you from having dessert if you haven’t eaten everything.

Beef is a dense meat, and it needs some fat in it to break it up—-I should talk about marbling on the blog at some point.

I thought that the main reason why beef comes from boy cows0 is that all the girl cows1 are working in the dairy industry. And the reason they come without bollocks is that, with bollocks, they tend to try to kill you if you get in the field with them.

I’ve met ill-tempered bollock-toting bulls before. It wasn’t fun.

0 ‘cattlebeasts’
fn1. ‘cows’

Murray | 2008-10-15 16:51:11 UTC

Bloody loved it! Did I spot a Brass Eye cow homage?

pajh | 2008-10-15 17:19:03 UTC

@Murray: I don’t think there was any deliberate Brass Eye homage in the episode. There was one on my personal blog during filming.

JayZee | 2008-11-27 07:02:52 UTC

OMG – I thought I understood cooking. Hats off to you good sirs.

| 2008-11-27 10:47:04 UTC

Hmmm. All the best Steaks I’ve eaten didn’t need Steak Knives, just an average eating knife. Mind you all the best Steaks I’ve eaten were cooked by Good Chefs who knew exactly what they were doing with a pan.

Steve | 2008-11-27 12:20:11 UTC

I liked Heston Blumenthal’s steak idea, but couldn’t be bothered getting a whole rib joint and sticking it in the oven at a temperature lower than my oven goes, for a day. This looks much more practical.

I notice no mention of resting the steak. I presume this isn’t so necessary if you’re juices haven’t been squeezed out in a high temperature pan?

Hugh | 2008-11-27 12:45:10 UTC

There’s a lot of debate as to whether it’s necessary to rest sous-vide cooked meat. For a temperature that low, it really shouldn’t make that much difference, as the muscles have barely contracted.

Having said that, the steak actually gets a bit of “resting” time whilst you’re blowtorching it. It seems to work, either way.

Heston B’s recipe is probably better than ours, I’m afraid. The 50 centigrade cooking time stimulates enzymes that rapidly age the meat, improving it. But yes, it is a massive faff.

Rob | 2008-11-27 16:45:41 UTC

A great episode. I’ve cooked steak roughly twice, give or take, in my lifetime, and it came out ok. But 90 bloody minutes?! I’d die of hunger and/or boredom before I ever got a taste of blood-soaked musculature.


Make a comment





Edit | Back

The Perfect Steak

We learn the science of the perfect steak – and how to cook it using a home vacuum cleaner and a blowtorch.

Length: 9 min 30

Links:

Credits:

Presented by Alex, Paul and Hugh

Petunia – Lizzie Cass-Maran
Random Fijian – Ariadne Cass-Maran

Camerawork by Stuart Brown

Editing by Hugh Hancock

Motion Graphics by Hugh Hancock

Pictures by

ninjapoodles
Miro-Foto
mborowick
KB35
Official Star Wars Blog
benny yap
rileyroxx - Richard Riley
Minette Layne
RightIndex - Lin Mei
BigFrank
Luis Montemayor

If we’ve forgotten anyone, email us and we’ll add you immediately!

License: Released under Creative Commons BY-SA-NC