Episodes Blog About Shop
Subscribe

Normal Person vs ... Gordon Ramsay



Comments

Calum C | 2008-11-26 13:32:20 UTC

Absolutely loved that episode, managed to bring on the megalulz. Well done all, I’ve become a big fan.

Stu Nathan | 2008-11-26 13:32:25 UTC

So… hang on… you’re making a white sauce with some infused milk, adding some pureed sprouts, then folding in beaten eggwhites, right?

If so, what the fuck’s he doing telling you to make a fucking beurre manié and beating it in? That’s a fucking crap way of doing it. Make a fucking roux and strain the fucking milk into it, then fucking whisk until it fucking thickens. And fold in the fucking eggwhites with a fucking metal spoon. He should have fucking said that.

And do you do anything with the egg yolks?

I tried Gordon fucking Ramsay’s fucking simple fucking watercress soup once. It didn’t fucking work. And I can fucking cook. Fucker.

Alison Rowan | 2008-11-26 14:30:24 UTC

That looks fucking horrible. And I like Brussel sprouts…

Hugh | 2008-11-26 14:51:27 UTC

I love sprouts too. And yes, it was horrible.

@Calum – thanks!

@Stu – yep, that’s basically (fucking) it. Plus a big pile of goat’s cheese. It, erm, didn’t work too well.

You add the yolks with the cheese.

Yeah – it’s amazing the amount of stuff he failed to mention in what was supposed to be a recipe for someone who hadn’t cooked a souffle before.

Murray | 2008-11-26 18:28:57 UTC

Three hours of cookage and poor Johnnie didn’t even get a plate… Funny fail.

Noronhaville | 2008-11-26 18:36:52 UTC

Cheers, from Canada.

Caught the link to your blog/video on boing boing.

Fracking Brilliant vid! Are you going to try a Wolfgang Puck recipe next?

t | 2008-11-26 18:48:46 UTC

Holy shit you are the biggest nerds I’ve ever seen.

Frank Cohen | 2008-11-26 19:12:56 UTC

Fucking excellent video guys! We’re getting our fair share of Gordon here in California. He has a US version of Kitchen Nightmares. I’m a fan.

I’m also a home chef and would have tried the same recipe. You guys did ok with a difficult recipe! Well done.

It’s also great to hear you take a measure of what you accomplished. If it doesn’t taste great, then why bother?

Did I hear you right that it cost 20 British Pounds to buy the ingredients? I am continually amazed at how expensive it is to live in the UK!

-Frank

Hugh | 2008-11-26 19:26:12 UTC

@t – wow, that’s amazing. Really? Thanks.

@Noronhaville – interesting. I’ll consider it… We’re planning on trying a Heston Blumenthal recipe next.

@Frank – I love Kitchen Nightmares too. I think that’s really his strength – talking about the business of the restaurant industry.

I’ve also eaten at one of Ramsay’s original restaurants, and the food was stunning – really, really good.

On the recipe front, one of our regular viewers here is apparently trying the same recipe himself this evening, so stay tuned for a report from a person with slightly less normal skill levels…

Actually, it was £22 for all the ingredients. That is INSANELY expensive even for UK food.

CAIN | 2008-11-26 19:27:42 UTC

Entertaining as always, fellas, even though I don’t remotely like sprouts. Being hung over couldn’t have helped, especially at the cat vomit stage… :P

Fantastic stuff – the show, if not the food.

Will be back next week!

Michele | 2008-11-26 19:45:06 UTC

That’s not a food processor, it’s a blender…

Hugh | 2008-11-26 19:52:05 UTC

@CAIN – it was the vibration from the whisk that really screwed it all up. Johnnie was looking extremely green by the end.

@Michele – that’s a good point, and you’re dead right. I’m going to try pureeing sprouts with a food processor tomorrow and report back on whether it works.

Michele | 2008-11-26 19:55:54 UTC

@Hugh – The funny thing is, I noticed in the video that you actually had a food processor sitting next to the blender :) What on earth made you choose the blender?!

Jay | 2008-11-26 20:12:34 UTC

Next time try a Grant Achatz or Ferran Adria. That should come out well.

Becca | 2008-11-26 20:25:48 UTC

Nicely demonstrated! Sounds like a lovely recipe, shame ‘sounds like’ seems the only way to be able to describe it unless you’ve got Mr. Ramsay on tap to blend/paste/interpret it… perhaps he should add another f word to his vocabulary: flummoxing.

(While looking at the fate of the sprouts in that episode it does spring to mind, should you not like sprouts, that this might be the perfect recipe to try at Christmas when traditional sprout-time comes to call?)

Hugh | 2008-11-26 20:27:04 UTC

I’ve cooked a couple of Ferran Adria recipes in the past (simple ones). I wish there was a full Adria cookbook!

I am intending to cook the entire Fat Duck (Heston Blumenthal) tasting menu at some point – all 13 courses, including the liquid nitrogen ones.

I should really buy the Alinea book at some point.

jgodsey | 2008-11-26 20:27:20 UTC

i think i want to have Stu Nathan’s baby..how eloquent…but he hit the nail on the head. Gordaon Ramsay is an asshole and makes things sound harder than they are.

| 2008-11-26 21:10:36 UTC

Wow, you guys are terrible.

| 2008-11-26 21:35:11 UTC

It’s Brussels sprouts, not Brussel sprouts.

-pedantic

Stephen K | 2008-11-26 21:47:41 UTC

About 10 minutes I was felling run down and unwell. Having watched this I feel brilliant. Thanks for making my day!

Gordon Ramsay | 2008-11-26 22:21:54 UTC

Wow, that’s outrageous!!! LOL You’re promoting illiteracy by using a fucking video rather than writing out an article which can be quickly scanned and easily cited rather than laboring through the poor production of a YouTube video. Excelsior, gentlemen!!! You should continue to be enamored of ‘new technology’ that brings the brain-dead mentality of television to the internet.

c. worley | 2008-11-26 22:26:50 UTC

yo stu nathan, don’t try to fake the funk. yeah, gordan ramsay is a dick, but all respect must be given to him. all you “chefs” out there that try to talk shit on his style…you wish you were that good. you wish you came up with marco pierre white. the man has been around. he shits michelin stars. so suck it up and stop your shoemaking ways.

boo | 2008-11-26 22:42:56 UTC

I presume that the “Gordon Ramsay” quotation is a fake: even he – f***ing fake that he is, should be able to spell “labouring” in English.

Loved all the f***ing comments.

pajh | 2008-11-26 23:00:08 UTC

@boo: also “enamored” and “excelsior” (do Americans really say that?). I know Gordon’s making a fuckton of money over in the States, but I doubt he’s gone native just yet.

Also, since when is it our job to promote literacy? None of us are Jamie Oliver.

Mark Sutherland | 2008-11-26 23:25:32 UTC

Johnny’s shirt is fantastic. Also, Kitten Souffle. Awesome.

Jean-Loup | 2008-11-27 00:15:52 UTC

Bad example recipe for me, I can’t stand brussel sprouts so it’d probably be terrible even if Gordon Ramsay had done it himself.

Did you really spend £20 for this recipe? Seems rather excessive!

Alli | 2008-11-27 01:39:31 UTC

I’m most impressed that the souffles didn’t fall. Who cares if it tastes like shit; making a souffle for the first time and not winding up with a lumpy pit is pretty damn good.

I am a little concerned about shadow the on Alex at the end of the video though…I believe it’s the boom mike, but, well, it kinda looks like he peed his pants.

gojsgmdfh | 2008-11-27 02:06:21 UTC

There is a significant difference between a true geek and a ‘chic geek’
a true geek doesnt buy clothes off of thinkgeek, jinx, or any of those other garbage sites
a true geek doesnt need to proclaim he is, indeed, a geek, at every stange he can
a true geek is versatile

The Bohemian Reject | 2008-11-27 03:08:57 UTC

This is positively brillo pads. I don’t care if they’re true geeks or not. I just know it’s something that both I (An Acting Major) and my Roommate (A Physics Major) can get a kick out of. Keep up the good work guys!

Eleanor Blair | 2008-11-27 10:34:27 UTC

Just to say, a friend linked to this on her blog, and now I’ve added your syndicated feed to my reading list. The power of not very subliminal advertisement at its best.

Thanks guys, this had me giggling out loud in the office.

Hugh | 2008-11-27 11:26:39 UTC

Thanks, everyone! It’s fantastic to read all your comments.

@Ali – they didn’t rise much, either, to be fair. But I agree – in actual fact, Johnnie (who was doing all the cooking, since I don’t fit anyone’s definition of an “average cook”) is quite a decent cook, and did rather well with a horrible recipe.

And yeah, I’m pretty sure it was the mic. Or possibly the dustbin that we had the camera sitting on. We’re high-budget, us.

Stu Nathan | 2008-11-27 12:01:59 UTC

I think a regular-sized food processor would be too big to blend that small an amount. A blender should actually manage it, as long as you can vary the speed.

I used a stick blender with the small blending cup, and that worked fine with about 80g of sprouts and a tablespoon of milk. Start blending slowly and build up. I still needed to push the mush down with a spatula a couple of times, but I did end up with a thick purée rather than a salad.

Ben Sanders | 2008-11-27 13:17:44 UTC

My guess is that some people (eg me) consider blender to be a synonym of food processor.
What would you say the differences were?

undeadbydawn | 2008-11-27 13:42:40 UTC

any chance of a vegan/food alergy special?

that way i can try something

Nina | 2008-11-27 14:03:47 UTC

I am amazed that they kept a shape in the oven. Well done.

Hugh | 2008-11-27 14:35:11 UTC

@Ben – and me. Apparently technically the big round flat thing is a food processor.

@Undeadbydawn – we ARE actually planning some veganism in the future, maybe. Stay tuned.

Dan Abraham | 2008-11-27 15:07:17 UTC

What a disturbing video, alternately funny, sad, aggravating, and piteous. The jokes were really good, but I found myself quite intolerant of one thing:

You didn’t treat this the way you did when you first learned computers.

If you dive right in with computer hardware without looking up the terms or having good guidance, you smoke your hardware.

If you dive right in with food without looking up the terms or having good guidance, you ruin your food.

Terms like “scalding” and “seasoning” are no more esoteric than “seating” a card or “rebooting” a computer.

So, if you’re doing a show on how you can misinterpret recipes by not having a good foundation in the subject, go ahead, and I’ll tune elsewhere. But if you’re serious about checking out cooking myths, for the love of all that’s holy, do your homework!

1) Read the recipe through twice before you pick up any ingredients or a whisk.

2) If there are any terms you do not understand, look it up. You’ve got McGee, but that’s the equivalent of saying you can mix a martini because you’ve read the Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. Try Alton Brown’s “I’m Just Here for the Food” for the discussions on heat and the CIA’s text book “The Professional Chef” for the basics. For testing techniques, subscribe to Cook’s Illustrated, the best magazine for testing recipes.

3) Understand that many recipes are crap, especially restaurant recipes. Making a batch 4 souffles vastly differs from making a batch of 400 souffles. A bad translation doesn’t take that into account. The translation is generally done by someone who doesn’t work in the restaurant and may never have met Chef Ramsey.

4) Think about what you’re doing, then measure. For your pre-heating test, you sauteed one duck breast and put it immediately into a cold oven. The other one was left at room temperature for an unknown amount of time, then placed into a pre-heated oven. How could that possibly be a fair test?
Get an oven thermometer, a timer, an instant-read thermometer, and keep notes.

Otherwise, this is no different than the user who thought he could erase a typo by using white-out on the screen.

Please adjust all phrases and product names from American to English. And, no, we don’t use “excelsior” that often, unless you’re Stan Lee.)

Hugh | 2008-11-27 15:40:34 UTC

Interesting points. (It may be noted that I wasn’t cooking here – the point of the episode was to see if Johnnie, our “normal person”, could understand and follow a celebrity chef recipe. Other celeb chefs have done fine. Ramsay didn’t.)

You may be interested by Stu N’s followup piece over at http://www.kamikazecookery.com/blogs/80

1) If I was writing a non-expert guide to building a computer, I wouldn’t tell someone to “seat” a card. I’d give instructions on how to do it. When I wrote a technical book (pluggityplug) I was repeatedly and firmly told not to use unnecessary jargon. I believe that’s pretty standard advice.

2) Where did Johnnie ruin the recipe by misunderstanding terms? Johnnie may have guessed on “scalding”, but he guessed right. He looked up other terms, exactly as you’re suggesting. Whilst there’s only a brief shot of it in the video, he knew what “folding” was. And I’m sorry, I don’t believe that using a food processor would have magically sorted out the sprouts.

3) The “Many recipes are crap” argument is kind of our point. Let’s find out who can write recipes and who can’t. Nigella can. Jamie can, although they may not be good recipes. Gordon Ramsay, it would appear, can’t. (And that applies even if it was ghost-written – you’ve got to be a moron to let someone ghostwrite for you and not check it.)

4) Assumptions much? Johnnie had read the recipe before starting, several times.

And, FWIW, I believe quite a number of computer experts, including both Johnnie and I, subscribe to the “have a go and figure it out as you go along” school of hardware and programming. Some people read the entire manual before diving in, but it’s not a universal trend. That’s certainly the way I learned computers.

Toufas | 2008-11-27 16:07:53 UTC

why not read the whole recipe before doing anything that you have never done before?
also whats with the 20 pounds, 2 star anise (anises, anisee?) dont cost as much as the whole jar.
this wasnt a good attempt to be honest. your friend might be a wonderful guy, but i think he would rather go to mcdonalds than go to a proper restaurant or even cook his own food.

pajh | 2008-11-27 16:27:37 UTC

@Dan Abraham: But that’s exactly the point—in computing, there’s no entire publishing industry based on telling noobs how to flash their BIOSes. Tim Berners-Lee doesn’t have a primetime television show where he insists that anyone can build a Cray X-MP in their own home.

There are the For Dummies series, and the Complete Idiot’s Guide, and things like that, but those books tell you when something is difficult, they warn you if you might break something, and they tell you when it would be better to call in an expert. In computing, nobody is making money off the lie that anybody can do it with no prior knowledge.

With recipes and sleb-chef culture, that’s exactly the lie that they’re feeding us. And it’s that lie that we set out to test.

sandra stewart | 2008-11-27 21:58:06 UTC

Hey there Hugh – thanks for another episode. I saw the blurb about you guys on BoingBoing so good on you for making the “big time” with the techies.

#1. The content was not enough to hold my attention for 14 minutes. I am not patient with hung-over guys cooking.

#2. I hate brussels sprouts.

#3. Gordon Ramsey? over-rated. and not as cool as you guys are.

HPaul | 2008-11-28 18:52:05 UTC

you used a frign blender!!! the recipe clearly states food proccessor. no wonder the sprouts didnt turn out. http://static.howstuffworks.com/gif/food-processor-2.jpg

yes the recipe may suck.. but you did a pretty terrible job following what directions were there

Felekar Fox | 2008-11-28 22:45:53 UTC

Moar! We must have moar!
ahem Or to speak in a way that is in some way resembling intelligent English words, I absolutely love this series. I’ve just found it today, and have already watched through it all.
Numerous times actually half-fell out of my chair laughing.

Really looking forward to future episodes!

Leah | 2008-11-30 00:54:59 UTC

Seasoning doesn’t usually mean also pepper actually. It just means salt, in my experience. But if pepper won’t hurt it, whatever.

KiwiSteve | 2008-11-30 21:00:02 UTC

Ramsay’s recipes (and Lawson’s, and Oliver’s, and so on) are designed to be executed in nice well equipped middle-class kitchens with granite benchtops, two ovens and a range of saucepans and knives. And ramekins. Your kitchen (like mine) is too small and poorly equipped for this recipe.
In particular: Your sprouts are pathetically small, or you’ve thrown away too many of the outer leaves. Throw away some, but not that many. And cut a cross in the base of the sprouts before boiling, so they’ll cook all the way through.
Your knife is horrible, as is your onion-slicing technique. This is so basic.
Your induction hob is crap – you should have a gas one (and at least one fan-forced electric oven). With gas you can see how much heat you’re applying and develop judgement, which is useful when cooking.
You have a food processor with a blender attachment. Use the processor, not the blender, to whizz up the sprouts and add a little milk (as per the recipe) to make the stuff smooth.
The recipe says brush softened butter onto the inside of the ramekins – use a cooking brush, not a piece of greaseproof. Also, use four ramekins, not two ramekins and two teacups.
Your whisk is useless battery-powered crap. Buy a proper hand-powered whisk of a decent size.
You were supposed to break up the flour/butter mixture (a roux) into pieces and stir it into the flavoured milk a little at a time over heat. I would have used two pans and stirred the hot milk into the roux until it was a smooth sauce, so I part company with the recipe a little here.
You were supposed to turn out the ramekins onto individual ovenproof serving dishes, not the bottom of a grotty old baking pan.
Conclusions: Ramsay’s recipe is a fair bit of work, but it does have plenty of pauses in it while stuff is cooling down, when you should be getting on with the rest of the magnificent Islington/Camden Lock-style middle class feast you are preparing for your guests. It’s not meant to be meal in itself and it does presuppose a certain level of equipment and experience.
Relative to this recipe, you guys are not “normal persons”, but rather total newbs who should stick to meals more appropriate to your way of life. Did you know you can make a really good spaghetti sauce with a mix of minced pork and beef fried up, with a bottle of tomato pulp tipped on top, followed by 20 mins simmering?

Sabrosa | 2008-12-01 03:05:40 UTC

“Your sprouts are pathetically small, or you’ve thrown away too many of the outer leaves. Throw away some, but not that many. And cut a cross in the base of the sprouts before boiling, so they’ll cook all the way through.”

“Your knife is horrible, as is your onion-slicing technique”

@KiwiSteve: could be a good point but is any of this in the recipe?

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/food_and_drink/recipes/article3263942.ece

Ohh we can check!

-The recipe assumes we have all the correct kitchen tools: it doesn’t mention what type of knife to use.

-Sadly there is no onion slicing tutorial in mr R’s recipe.

- No mention of what the size of the sprouts should be.

- Recipe doesn’t mention what sort of whisk should be used, be it weak battery powered, or MANLY electric sort.

- The recipe doesn’t mention the impliment needed to brush the ramkins. Of course ‘brushing’ implies a brush is involved but not necessarily!

How pedantic are normal people?

Are normal people going to follow the recipe to the letter and be satisfied with their hardened bullet (sorry Johnny)? Or are they going to look at it and say ‘cor this needs a bit more water to be a proper paste’

Cooking might be a science but of course it can never be an exact ‘follow this to the mole’ sort because your ‘reactants’ aren’t going to have the same composition each time.

So what I mean is if your sprouts are too sprouty then you’re going to get a very overpowering sprout sensation!

So my question is what are these ‘normal’ people? Are they unquestioning robots, pedants, or do they use a bit of common sense from time to time?

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/food_and_drink/gordon_ramsay/article3263832.ece

Oh look even The Times has something to say on sprouts. So what’s the science behind the ice-cold water?

Sabrosa | 2008-12-01 03:07:01 UTC

ye gods, i’ve just read what I wrote! I was never a geek before I saw this show.

KiwiSteve | 2008-12-01 11:41:33 UTC

I missed the bit where Ramsay or the Times claimed this recipe was for normal people. But I do know it’s not for me, because, like I said, I don’t have a nice enough kitchen.

And also because if I was going to get into souffles I’d probably seek out a recipe for one with ingredients I’m enthusiastic about in the first place, like dead pig or mushrooms or salmon or chocolate. I’ll eat brussels sprouts if they’re put in front of me but I certainly don’t pursue them. (Unlike Ramsay, who also says not to bother with cutting a cross in the bottom of sprouts. Since I think Ramsay knows a thing or two I’ll bear that in mind if I ever cook another sprout.)

Making food with ingredients you know you don’t like all that much sounds like giving yourself a handicap right at the off.

Still, I think anyone could have looked at that hopeless whisk and known it was crap. I mean, would you put up with an electric toothbrush as feeble as that?

By which I mean it wasn’t all Ramsay’s fault the recipe didn’t satisfy.

Hugh | 2008-12-01 11:42:27 UTC

@Sabrosa – the ice-cold water’s to fix the colour in the sprouts – it prevents the clorophyll from breaking down.

@Felekar – thanks! That’s really nice to hear.

@HPaul – Ok, I’m going to go buy some Brussels sprouts and shoot a video of them in the food processor today. If they blend perfectly – my bad.

@Leah – Really? That’s interesting. To me it’s always meant “salt and pepper” – the standard seasonings. Thanks!

Stu, if you’re still reading this – did you actually find that the colour of the sprouts affected the colour of the souffle? Because if not, this stage is pointless…

@Steve – OK, to hit your key points…

1) I’ve cooked multiple Heston Blumenthal “Perfect” recipes, a twelve-course tasting menu, and a Chinese banquet in that kitchen. It should be able to handle a souffle. (Both the highly successful Nigella recipe and the fairly successful if a bit meh Jamie recipe were cooked in smaller, less well-equipped kitchens).

2) The sprouts were of average size, the weight specified in the recipe, and had a couple of leaves removed each.

3) Knife-slicing technique – I don’t think that most normal people in day-to-day life have CIA-approved knife skills. Johnnie’s skills are pretty representative of the average non-pro – hence why we asked him to cook.

I am, incidentally, very impressed by your ability to tell instantly the quality of a knife from one badly-lit oblique shot. (It’s an extremely sharp, well-balanced hand-made Japanese 64-fold blade from Kin Knives.)

4) Heat’s heat, dude. Control is an issue, but not when all you’re doing is boiling.

5) I think we’ve covered the blender thing. See above.

6) Erm, those are four ramekins. Identical ramekins.

7) Again, I’m impressed at your observation skills, particularly given the whisk has a (clearly visible) power cord.

8) No, it’s not a roux. See Stu’s piece

9) Serving dishes – yes, you’re absolutely right there. I don’t see that making much difference to the taste, though.

10) You might be interested in my article on ragu.

Stu Nathan | 2008-12-01 12:03:47 UTC

It’s hard to tell whether the colour of the sprouts affected the final colour. It was roughly the colour of your text box there, actually; if the sprouts had gone grey, it might have turned the whole thing khaki, I s’pose.

It’s not just to fix colour, by the way; it’s also to stop them from cooking by taking out the residual heat. That would be important in this recipe, because if you cook the sprouts too long, you’d end up with the nasty sulphurous flavour that everyone associated with soggy sprouts.

As I said, there wasn’t much sprout flavour — a slight bitter edge, maybe — but it certainly didn’t taste of overcooked sprout.

I usually do cut a cross in sprouts. I know you’re not supposed to need to, but I just think it looks nicer (and if you’re buttering your sprouts, it helps the butter sink in). I cut them in half for this recipe for two reasons — I wanted to make sure they cooked evenly and then quenched properly when I refreshed them, and it would help with blending them later.

For all those people questioning Hugh’s choice of a blender rather than a food processor — for a small amount of material, I think a blender is a better choice. Does your blender have a variable speed, Hugh? If so, you would have done better starting very slowly to chop the sprouts, then speeding up. A full-size processor would have been useless – it would just have chucked everything to the sides of the bowl. My little Braun blender attachment has the same S-shaped blade as a food processor, but smaller, only about 10cm across. I think it’s the perfect tool for this sort of job.

Hugh | 2008-12-01 12:17:21 UTC

Stu – oh, yeah, that’s true. I’d forgotten the “arrest heating” element.

(Having said that, I’m never 100% convinced by that idea, because normally when you then re-heat the veg at the end, it’ll start cooking again. Not so much the case here, though, because we’re combining the sprouts with other stuff.)

Blender – it has a couple of speeds, but nothing terribly fancy. We were using the lower speed setting to produce the “salad” effect.

Sabrosa | 2008-12-01 12:21:53 UTC

@Hugh,

you didn’t answer my question on the pedantic nature of normal people ;-)

Hugh | 2008-12-01 13:42:12 UTC

The aim of the episode, and the Normal Person series in general, is to see what normal people who aren’t expert cooks do when they’re faced with a celebrity chef recipe. Johnnie, our Normal Person, reacted how Johnnie reacted.

So, in answer – Johnnie reacted like that, so that’s at least one way a normal non-expert would react.

(I think that’s pretty common. Most people who don’t cook from recipes a lot, particularly when cooking from a complex recipe, won’t be confident enough to deviate from it – after all, it’s hard to tell when doing that will screw the entire thing up.)

Alison Rowan | 2008-12-05 14:18:26 UTC

So do you think Gordon actually wrote or tested the recipe himself. Because as The Guardian points out today, he doesn’t usually…

SpudTater | 2008-12-05 20:46:42 UTC

KiwiSteve: So, by your definition, a ‘normal person’ is upper-middle-class with a phenomenally well-equipped kitchen and a penchant for dinner parties?

Reality, Steve. Steve, reality. I don’t believe you’ve met?

8^)

Hugh | 2008-12-05 20:58:18 UTC

@Alison – If he’s so willing to lose his good name as a chef that he’ll let crap people write his recipes, then he deserves all the scorn we can heap upon him.

My hypothesis on this recipe is either a) He didn’t write it, and someone tried to write something using “sensational” ingredients in order to sound like him (and fucked it up) or b) It’s his recipe, but missing either vital ingredients or instructions (although common sleb chef habit, according to the smart people at Egullet.com).

I think I’m going to try a couple of recipes from * Chef, and see how they compare…


Make a comment





Edit | Back

Normal Person vs ... Gordon Ramsay

Can geek Johnnie cook Gordon f—-ing Ramsay’s Brussel f—-ing sprout souffle? We put the sweariest of all celeb chefs to the test.

Length: 14 min

Links:

Credits:

Presented by Hugh

Normal Person: Johnnie Ingram

Camerawork and direction by Hugh Hancock, Stuart Brown, and Paul AJ Hamilton

Editing, motion graphics, and sound by Hugh Hancock

Photos by

Mikewade @ Flickr
exfordy @ Flickr
Tina Keller @ Flickr
The Marmot @ Flickr

Executive Producer Hugh Hancock

License: Released under Creative Commons BY-SA-NC