| Nouvelle cuisine, and all that shite. | Alex 2008-10-03 13:31:00 UTC |
I remember back when I was a teenager, nouvelle cuisine was almost a laughing stock. These tiny plates of food, arranged in some sort of pattern, almost invariably involving cubes or squares. It was considered as a big con, to make you pay lots of money for almost no food, just because the chef had the presence of mind to arrange it to look like a box. Well, times have moved on, if not progressed. Consider current popular food culture, e.g. Professional Masterchef1, and that restaurant show (I forget the name, possibly “The restaurant”). “True” restaurant food has all gotta be tiny portions and geometric shapes or it just doesn’t fit the bill. Well, honestly, I’ve been to a couple of these places, normally on Hugh’s bidding, and I’m yet to be truly impressed. Particularly dreadful was a certain supposedly fine-dining restaurant located in Edinburgh’s largest museum. Now this was bloody shameful, we order a meal like, 4 weeks in advance, (they say they’ll charge us extra (beyond the deposit) if anyone doesn’t show). When we get there, they make every effort to make us feel we’re not good enough for the place, sell us cold soup2, a bland and stingy (if terribly neatly arranged) main of chicken, and some thoroughly forgettable dessert. They also blithely charge us £8 per glass of wine. Compare this with a nice local restaurant: for between one tenth and half the price, you get much more food, some of which is actually hot; the staff are friendly; you can have a glass of wine for less than the price of a mortgage and you leave the place full, satisfied, and able to pay your rent that month. Now, I’m not saying that all “fine dining” restaurants are as bad as the one I’ve mentioned above, I’ve been to a few where I’ve thought, “that was quite nice”, or “scallops are edible, I never knew!”. The thing is that I’m not really seeing this tremendous difference in quality of the food which should go along with the price. Expensive, so called fine-dining restaurants regard themselves as being on a completely different scale to your average pub or chinese restaurant3, they seem to reckon that just by making food in this style, they’re automatically better than others, regardless of whether they actually bother to put any effort into making their food is cooked correctly, or actually tastes good. Well, it’s a matter of perception, and I’m not fooled, good food tastes good, whether it looks good or not. Bad food doesn’t, and I’m not going to go on about how good it is just ’cos it was presented well and I paid far too much for it. … 1 Or as I liked to call it, “Bad-skin Challenge”. Every episode – Who do you want to win: the one with pale skin with ominous brown scars; the one with good old fashioned acne; or the one who looks like he hasn’t slept in the last 3 years? 2 I don’t give a flying rat’s arse if it’s called Compote; if it looks and tastes like you’ve emptied a bag of Morrisons value fine-chopped frozen mixed vegetables, then covered it in lukewarm salty water, you’re doing it wrong. 3 The best meal I ever had was in a chinese restaurant in Leeds, yeah, it wasn’t very subtle, but it tasted great, looked good, there was tons of it and they’d got just the right green tea to go with the meal. | |
| Louise Dennis | 2008-10-03 12:42:34 UTC Interesting to learn that the restaurant located in Edinburgh’s largest museum has not improved since it opened nearly 10 years ago. Speaking though as someone with not that large an appetite (at least not when eating all in one go), I’ve always liked nouvelle cuisine because there is a fair chance that I’ll actually get to eat the pudding as well as the starter and main course without making myself feel ill. | |
| Hugh | 2008-10-03 13:10:08 UTC I sort of agree. Obviously, I’m a bit more into my fancy dining than Alex (having wandered along to more than a couple of Michelin starred places in my time), but I get extremely annoyed by anywhere that seems to feel, just because it has French names on the food and expensive tableware, that its diners are somehow in its debt. And I agree, a good unpretentious restaurant can provide just as good a dining experience on the right night. What “fancy” restaurants, at least the good ones, do, though, is advance the medium. You’re very unlikely to see a truly new dish on the menu of an average Chinese restaurant – by contrast, you’d be disappointed if any course on a Michelin-star tasting menu wasn’t at least a bit original. But that’s pretty much it. I recall overhearing comments at one foodie show about one of my favourite restaurants in Edinburgh. A terribly posh Morningside lady said “Oh, yes, well, the food is fantastic, of course, but I’d never go back there. The decor was just terrible.” And that’s the sort of attitude that keeps your Nameless Restaurant in business. Idiots. | |
| Cabalamat | 2008-10-04 17:06:32 UTC If a restaurant remains in business, one presumes that they are supplying some desire. If the restaurant serves food that’s nothing special at exorbitant prices, then the desire they are supplying probably isn’t that for good food. Possibly it is that for conspicuous consumption — people go there solely because it is expensive, to show that they can. |
Latest Blog Entries
Tips for surviving the Four Hour Body as a foodie - recipes and tips
Khymos is going through Srs Fd Science - today, stocks
Your Chocolate Is Made By Enslaved Kids
Pressure Extraction - My First Attempts
Pressure, extraction, and marinades
Latest Comments
Comments will return once our spammer plague slows
-
-
-
-
-
-
Latest KKC Infodumps
What's the best blue electric kettle on the market?
What's the best organic instant coffee brand?
Should you buy a steel cafetiere? Actually, yes.
What are ESE coffee pods, and do they compare to a real espresso?
How -and Why - to find Fair Trade chocolate brands
What you need to know about fair trade bananas
What you need to know about Shade-Grown Coffee